As I said, I am no fan of Naomi Wolf and can live with her ban. However, as always with censorship, things can creep into sinister areas very quickly.
Where is the line drawn? Outright rubbish about 5G, or people questioning the efficiency of masks, talking about side effects of vaccines, or organising protests against lockdown? Someone has to make that decision, and does that affect our rights, as adults, to access information and make up our own minds?
The British government already has a special unit working with social media companies to 'combat misinformation.' Can we be sure that is actually fake news, or is it simply anything going outside their preferred narrative? It is a very fine line, but also a very important one.
A rapid response unit is working with social media firms to take down misleading or harmful content.
www.bbc.com
We already saw with the lab leaks that fake news might not actually be fake news. The Indian government has outright demanded that FB take down posts critical of the government response to covid, and they are not alone.
Journalist unions and free speech organisations have been very vocal in condemning governments suppressing information under the guise of covid. It is something we should all be aware of.
Reporters without Borders warns governments are using the coronavirus pandemic as a means to crack down on freedom of the press.
www.euronews.com
Governments are using the pandemic as a pretext to crack down on free expression and access to information.
freedomhouse.org
Plus, there are plenty of other reasons to suggest that censorship is actually counterproductive, simply driving views underground where they cannot be challenged. Perhaps, if Wakefield had access to social media, he would have been challenged more quickly.