They write research papers and white papers to influence policy - therefore, these papers are what matters. In turn, these are challenged, others look at the data and produce their own papers, and people can arrive at conclusions based upon this debate. As I said, I have seen nothing that suggests fracking will deliver anywhere near the benefits claimed - it also has to fit in with wider energy research and policy otherwise it has no meaningful context. For example, if you make the economic argument, then you have to bring in alternatives, look at trends, predict the future, and balance the costs and benefits. The Levelized Cost of Energy does not stack up for fracking in Europe, especially given the timescale - even fossil fuel companies have become more pessimistic.I was dealing with raw data, before it had the chance to be watered down or embellished.
I have seen nothing within the fracking literature to suggest that it is a viable answer. It will be obsolete before it comes anywhere near producing significant amounts of gas - if it does at all.