Its lately become de rigueur to trash mainstream science. So we now have a govt that routinely claims that if you plan nothing and do nothing, you dont need to worry since things generally turn out OK. This absolutely suits those that just want to carry on trashing the place or their neighbours. And they get a barrow load of votes out of it. Sadly we've seen what happens with Brexit if you do nothing when you exit your biggest market. With Covid, the gibbon wanted to do nothing but was forced into light lockdowns because of he couldnt quite ignore all the science. And after the event, we seem to have people rewriting what happened and almost suggesting we should have done nothing. And now the biggest bollock of all is to claim that we're not risking human extinction because of proven exhaustion of resources, soil and species. Seemingly because a person has produced a model and result which is dodgy. Its simply not true that a scientific conclusion that we are heading to hell in a handcart is based on one climate model. Mainly because the Earth ecovsystems are so complex and interrelated, its impossible to model how fast degradation might happen. Its based on decades of evidence of what has happened to the ecosystems, how they are becoming less robust through vastly reduced diversity from our interventions and the rate at which they have changed to date. Despite a mile high pile of evidence that we are responsible for significant elements of the degradation, the latest brilliant piece of avoidance is to suggest it might not be us that is responsible, so maybe we might not need to do anything much differently. It reminds me of all those years the govts defended cigarette smoking because at the time you couldnt prove conclusively it was the cause of lung cancer. Pretty sad that weve learnt bugger all and just stick our heads in the sand.