Id say he has increased party membership massively. Perhaps there are those in the party who see that as a threat?
I do believe he will go so far then people will become sick of him
Id say he has increased party membership massively. Perhaps there are those in the party who see that as a threat?
Possibly, but for now I think, as a country, were actually getting an opposition that is finally worthy of the name. I honestly wonder would we have had as much open and frank debate debate about tax credits and now the syria crisis under under the former Labour leadership?I do believe he will go so far then people will become sick of him
Possibly, but for now I think, as a country, were actually getting an opposition that is finally worthy of the name. I honestly wonder would we have had as much open and frank debate debate about tax credits and now the syria crisis under under the former Labour leadership?
Even at times when it's cheaper though?
Yes , they can suffer with the plebs - I ll pay the cost difference.
Seriously , should be cheapest of course - it's our money .
Possibly, but for now I think, as a country, were actually getting an opposition that is finally worthy of the name. I honestly wonder would we have had as much open and frank debate debate about tax credits and now the syria crisis under under the former Labour leadership?
Agree, pretty much..but think on those two major and pressing issues, he has been on his own ground...and public opposition and or cynicism was pretty nailed on.
Thornier developments will prove the real test.
I honestly believe both would have been nodded through on former leadershios. the Tax credit one already had been by the party being whipped to abstain to allow free passage for the welfare reform bill.Good point. He hasn't really had to try to hard to rally the troops on these topics
I honestly believe both would have been nodded through on former leadershios. the Tax credit one already had been by the party being whipped to abstain to allow free passage for the welfare reform bill.
I dont know what can be much more thorny than risking the lives our people to fight a war in syria.
Here we go, you are the main accuser of people yet youve just come on to a topic and got personal. You cant help yourself can you?
do you believe the media doesnt, at best, attempt to mislead opinion? Or are you here to start yet another bitchfest?
![]()
![]()
![]()
Its how it works.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Its how it works.
![]()
Following the publication of an article in The Daily Express on 24 July 2015, headlined “311 languages spoken in our schools”, Jonathan Portes complained to the Independent Press Standards Organisation that The Daily Express had breached Clause 1 (Accuracy) of the Editors’ Code of Practice. The complaint was upheld, and IPSO required the newspaper to publish this adjudication.
The front page article reported that English “is starting to die out” in schools. It also reported that there are some schools where English-speaking pupils are “becoming a minority”; where English is “hardly heard at all”; and where “foreign languages have overtaken English”. The article said that this was taking place due to an “open door” immigration policy, and referred to Department for Education (DfE) data about specific schools in relation to these claims.
The complainant said that the article’s central claims were inaccurate. It also inaccurately suggested that in some schools, lessons are not taught in English. The data referred to by the newspaper only recorded a pupils’ first language; it did not say that those pupils would be unable to speak English. Further, English is the language of instruction in all maintained schools in England.
The Daily Express accepted that the article may have suggested inaccurately that pupils who did not speak English as a first language could not speak English at all, and that English is not spoken in some classrooms. It said that when reading the article as a whole, the inaccuracies would not have significantly misled readers. It offered to publish a correction both online and in its “Amplifications & Corrections” column on its letters page.
The Complaints Committee found that the article’s claims that English “is starting to die out” in schools and that English was “hardly heard at all” in some schools were completely unsupported by the data the newspaper had cited. These claims distorted the data cited by the newspaper, which did not include any information about the frequency with which English was spoken in schools, by either pupils or teachers.
This was a particularly concerning case because the inaccuracies had been repeated throughout the entire article, including prominently in the front-page sub-headline, and because they were central to the report, on a matter of significant importance. The newspaper’s defence that the article was not misleading when read as a whole did not demonstrate that the newspaper had taken care to report the data accurately. The complaint was upheld as a breach under Clause 1.
The Committee was also concerned by the newspaper’s proposals to correct the inaccuracies in its “Amplifications & Corrections” column on its letters page. There was no information published on this page to signal to readers that this was where the column would normally appear, and the column itself was published infrequently. Given its position in the newspaper, the letters page was not an otherwise sufficiently prominent location for the proposed correction, since the article had appeared prominently on the front page. This aspect of the complaint was also upheld under Clause 1.
Jeremy Corbyn has been handed a major victory over Britain’s leading tabloid, after The Sun was ordered to publish a front page correction for a story which falsely claimed the Labour leader only agreed to be initiated as a Privy Councillor because his party stood to gain financially.