Ifollow said he booked twoNo Nobbers booked today Rem, just 2 windies for fouls
Ifollow said he booked twoNo Nobbers booked today Rem, just 2 windies for fouls
Nowt showing on BBC Match report... https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/54940927Ifollow said he booked two
He wasn't atrocious but his passing is now at best rather ordinary and can be sloppy.I thought Gallagher did quite well today - he at least enabled Johnson to move forward to where he's most effective.
Not quite that long but a couple of seasons back Huntington was looking very suspect in the air and coupled with his lack of real pace on the ground then it looked like a move down a division would be best for everyone. He has got no faster but his positional play is making up for it and I am happy to see him justifying his place in the squad.
Serve the fuckers right. 👍No bump effect so far at Forest with the arrival of a new manager.
Que? No hablo espanol.Que, is '60 fookin years waiting not enough' type of reply
No I know but they deffo said the ref showed a yellow cardNowt showing on BBC Match report... https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/54940927
Nice stop gap Ernie but not the future in all honesty but love the lad to bits, top professional, top bloke and 2015 play off contribution I will always be grateful for
Fisher and DJ both for dissent I thinkIfollow said he booked two
😁 I'm not a ref and don't really know the intricacies of how "the laws" are interpreted and applied but I do know that approximately 90% of fans and 100% of pundits have no idea what they are talking about when it comes to fouls.Had a little look on the Owls forum and whilst the red card incident was getting heated for/against someone asked what rule was being enforced.
Reply : 'The you can't put your studs into another players fookin neck rule' .... made me chuckle that
😁 I'm not a ref and don't really know the intricacies of how "the laws" are interpreted and applied but I do know that approximately 90% of fans and 100% of pundits have no idea what they are talking about when it comes to fouls.
"Serious foul play" probably covers it for today along with a dose of recklessness and a bit of disproportionate force.
Thought the sameThere's an interesting gif here from the Wednesday forum.
DJ seems to be saying to the ref that it's not a red!
A lot on here thought it was harsh at firstThere's an interesting gif here from the Wednesday forum.
DJ seems to be saying to the ref that it's not a red!
There's an interesting gif here from the Wednesday forum.
DJ seems to be saying to the ref that it's not a red!
It amazes me how many ‘experts’ use the term reckless to justify a red card when the laws clearly say it’s a yellow card offence. Having said that it was a definite red for Windass and should have been for Van Aken aswell.Endangering an opponent and excessive force would be the possibilities, probably the former. Reckless would be a yellow card.
It amazes me how many ‘experts’ use the term reckless to justify a red card when the laws clearly say it’s a yellow card offence. Having said that it was a definite red for Windass and should have been for Van Aken aswell.
And there I’ve been on cloud nine thinking we’d won😉A very good point