Many of us know it’s an addiction that can be bad for you and also gives you an occasional high and is hard to shake off.This new love in your life will quickly fade once the season starts 😂
Many of us know it’s an addiction that can be bad for you and also gives you an occasional high and is hard to shake off.This new love in your life will quickly fade once the season starts 😂
Nah. You get a fat redneck trying to work off his beer gut!if i type all these into my zx spectrum do i get Daley Thompsoms Decathalon
Putting this here so as not to clog up another thread . . .
Just to be sure I'm understanding the positions correctly: A wing back, either left or right, is a defender who also inverts (?) and helps with the attack. Is that it?
They have to be a full back (defender) and winger (attacker) combined in one position - to do it well, they need to be super-athletic and freakishly good footballers.Putting this here so as not to clog up another thread . . .
Just to be sure I'm understanding the positions correctly: A wing back, either left or right, is a defender who also inverts (?) and helps with the attack. Is that it?
Thanks.They're half way between a winger and a full back. Often the only source of width on a team. Usually ends up either looking like a winger with a lot of defensive responsibility, or a defender with a lot of license to push forward.
Very demanding role, as you have to get up and down the pitch a lot.
I thought I'd seen that inverting was from front to back. Thanks for the clarification.They have to be a full back (defender) and winger (attacker) combined in one position - to do it well, they need to be super-athletic and freakishly good footballers.
Ours tend towards being good at one of the jobs (defence/attack), pretty crap at the other.
The "inverted" stuff is different - that's when a left-sided player plays on the right (and vice versa).
Forgive this example, but I started my football journey following Man City . . . When Kyle Walker, who is normally a RB, regularly comes forward to help with the attack (shots on goal, passes into the box from the corner area, etc.), he is basically playing like a wing back, even if it's not his actual position?They're half way between a winger and a full back. Often the only source of width on a team. Usually ends up either looking like a winger with a lot of defensive responsibility, or a defender with a lot of license to push forward.
Very demanding role, as you have to get up and down the pitch a lot.
Not an expert on the terminology by any means, but I believe it's more outside/inside - being on the "wrong" side tends to make them naturally cut inside on their stronger foot when they get the ball, rather than stay out wide.I thought I'd seen that inverting was from front to back. Thanks for the clarification.![]()
Makes sense. I try to watch a lot of The Athletic guys on TIFO IRL on YouTube, so I probably missed it.Not an expert on the terminology by any means, but I believe it's more outside/inside - being on the "wrong" side tends to make them naturally cut inside on their stronger foot when they get the ball, rather than stay out wide.
Forgive this example, but I started my football journey following Man City . . . When Kyle Walker, who is normally a RB, regularly comes forward to help with the attack (shots on goal, passes into the box from the corner area, etc.), he is basically playing like a wing back, even if it's not his actual position?
OK. Thanks.It's more that he's just an attacking full back, if he's got a wide player ahead of him. Wingback tends to mean that he's covering both roles.