At the moment, we're getting all the downsides of a counter-attacking game (defensive setup, very few chances created, can be quite turgid to watch) without any of the benefits (occasional high speed attacks and actual goals).I don't disagree with you, but that implies you want us to play a counter attacking game. Which is inherently more defensive minded.
Isn't that the opposite of what everyone is moaning about?
When AN came in, he dropped our previous counter-attacking approach, insisting his style of play would be completely different.
I wonder if the way we're playing now is what he had in mind back then?