PNE Online
Welcome to PNE-Online. Why not register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox! You can also join up as a forum Patron to help support in the running costs of the forum.

The “Trans” debate

Fortunately for us all, the Green Party's document about 'queerphobia' makes things perfectly clear - you now have no excuse for saying the wrong things:



Absolutely meaningless word salad written by people with a tenuous grasp on reality.
 
Fortunately for us all, the Green Party's document about 'queerphobia' makes things perfectly clear - you now have no excuse for saying the wrong things:



Absolutely meaningless word salad written by people with a tenuous grasp on reality.


Did @Regardless write that ? :D Only joking Reg, you've more sense.

I did make an attempt at reading that but soon reached the conclusion of " Fuck this for a lark ". :)
 
That is so bad it’s hilarious and yet at the same a bit scary.

How the feck can you be so stupid that you cannot see that your very definition of the word is subjective and therefore predicated on opinion rather than objective fact?

Good grief look at this (excuse the photos -PDF)

2A0A5EF8-5015-4B18-BABD-D5F043446701.jpeg
581D51A1-8C7F-46ED-8327-F5087703F301.jpeg
Brilliant - so if you’re only sexually attracted to intelligent people then you don’t make their list because it ‘could be considered’ a form of ‘ism’
NUTS!

And you are also transphobic if you think children should not be permitted to undergo life-changing surgery unless there is clinical need…

4F6B28F3-CE54-4D05-8AB9-3EFAFC0A62E5.jpeg

And then this opinion is transphobic…

65D2BC60-5FC1-46B5-9F1F-E66354FE6308.jpeg

Good grief. 1984.
 
That is so bad it’s hilarious and yet at the same a bit scary.

How the feck can you be so stupid that you cannot see that your very definition of the word is subjective and therefore predicated on opinion rather than objective fact?

Good grief look at this (excuse the photos -PDF)

View attachment 16678
View attachment 16679
Brilliant - so if you’re only sexually attracted to intelligent people then you don’t make their list because it ‘could be considered’ a form of ‘ism’
NUTS!

And you are also transphobic if you think children should not be permitted to undergo life-changing surgery unless there is clinical need…

View attachment 16680

And then this opinion is transphobic…

View attachment 16681

Good grief. 1984.
Is is truly abject - I have rarely seen the English language mangled in such a way. Whoever wrote that should be thoroughly ashamed.
 
I can’t even be bothered to read all that tripe. It’s simple to me, I will be kind and respectful to every person who is the same to me. I don’t care what colour, creed, sexual orientation or disability or even ability. I don’t know why we have to go beyond that, it’s that simple.
 
Top