• Hello and welcome to PNE Online.

    Why not get the most out of the forum, join in the debate and access a whole range of additional benefits?

    We are AD Free and open to all, but by becoming a member you can also find out how you can support us to stay online.

    Simply click "register" at the top of the page.

Capital punishment

Do you agree with Capital Punishment?

  • Yes

    Votes: 15 18.5%
  • No

    Votes: 37 45.7%
  • Yes- but only in exceptional circumstances

    Votes: 29 35.8%

  • Total voters
    81
Again, what is 'bloody obvious'? You do have to have a boundary somewhere to determine what level of evidence constitutes whether something is obvious or not. We are back to the idea of deciding what that arbitrary boundary is, and assuming that the police, juries, judges, prosecutors, and expert witnesses don't make mistakes and/or skew the process. Judges have been know to make mistakes on many occasions...

Once one innocent person is wrongly executed, the whole process becomes unjustifiable. That is too high a price to pay for vengeance.
This is the issue with case law
How on earth are those boundaries set?
 
This is the issue with case law
How on earth are those boundaries set?
Exactly - the legal system is always going to be flawed, is always open to human interpretation, and mistakes will be made wherever you decide to try and set a boundary - hence the need for appeals etc. The problem with the death sentence is that it is the one thing that cannot be undone.
 
Again, what is 'bloody obvious'? You do have to have a boundary somewhere to determine what level of evidence constitutes whether something is obvious or not. We are back to the idea of deciding what that arbitrary boundary is, and assuming that the police, juries, judges, prosecutors, and expert witnesses don't make mistakes and/or skew the process. Judges have been know to make mistakes on many occasions...

Once one innocent person is wrongly executed, the whole process becomes unjustifiable. That is too high a price to pay for vengeance.
It's OK, if an innocent person is executed, we can then execute all the people involved in convicting them and carrying out the execution.
 
Again, what is 'bloody obvious'? You do have to have a boundary somewhere to determine what level of evidence constitutes whether something is obvious or not. We are back to the idea of deciding what that arbitrary boundary is, and assuming that the police, juries, judges, prosecutors, and expert witnesses don't make mistakes and/or skew the process. Judges have been know to make mistakes on many occasions...

Once one innocent person is wrongly executed, the whole process becomes unjustifiable. That is too high a price to pay for vengeance.

Stabbing 3 kids to death in Southport isn't obvious?.... Mind you the authorities and his mental health will get the blame for that no doubt.

If there's any doubt whatsoever then I wouldn't advocate it. Letby being a good example as mentioned yesterday. Probably guilty but I wouldn't hang her. I'd have hung Brady, Hindley and West though.
 
Stabbing 3 kids to death in Southport isn't obvious?.... Mind you the authorities and his mental health will get the blame for that no doubt.

If there's any doubt whatsoever then I wouldn't advocate it. Letby being a good example as mentioned yesterday. Probably guilty but I wouldn't hang her. I'd have hung Brady, Hindley and West though.
There will no doubt be an enquiry about his engagement, if any, with mental health services.

There's no debate about just how neglected this area has been since 2010.
 
Stabbing 3 kids to death in Southport isn't obvious?.... Mind you the authorities and his mental health will get the blame for that no doubt.

If there's any doubt whatsoever then I wouldn't advocate it. Letby being a good example as mentioned yesterday. Probably guilty but I wouldn't hang her. I'd have hung Brady, Hindley and West though.
Again, that is not addressing my point. You are bringing cases where it does appear obvious. but what about other cases that are less obvious. Where is the boundary for whether you decide to execute someone or not? There needs to be one somewhere, legally, and it is a question that needs answering before we even get near going down that path.
 
Murder is murder. I'd always rather the punishment be a lifetime of having all freedoms removed in basic conditions.
Murder IS murder. Capital punishment is not. Murder, by definition, requires malice aforethought. Capital punishment is the institutional, publicized response to such actions. It's a possible consequence to a choice made by the offender.
 
Again, that is not addressing my point. You are bringing cases where it does appear obvious. but what about other cases that are less obvious. Where is the boundary for whether you decide to execute someone or not? There needs to be one somewhere, legally, and it is a question that needs answering before we even get near going down that path.

I understand your point completely. It's open to abuse,corruption and fuck ups..... My point is that there are cases where it isn't even open to discussion and they should be removed permanently from society......There are such cases and that's a fact. You're arguing a grey area and on that we agree.
 
Another thought
Some of the individuals who might fall into the alleged no doubt category have numerous cronies who bizarrely look up to them
Applying CP could give them legendary status whereas a lifetime in prison would see them slowly but surely disappear into an abyss of anonymity?
 
Huntley is another obvious case of 100% guilty.

Sutcliffe was another.

When you have tens of witnesses, CCTV, Mobile Phone evidence, then evidence is pretty much conclusive whom the guilty party is.

I agree with @Liberation, when the evidence is 100% cast iron, then a length of rope should be re-introduced.

People say "rehabilitate them".

Ok, they served their time, have been "rehabilitated inside", would you be comfy living next door to the above 2 I mentioned? Offering them a job? Having them date a family member or friend?

Yes, I know both got "life terms" and Huntley is unlikely to be ever released but there are others similar who will one day be released - and likely to re-offend.

Obviously a bit tricky with Sutcliffe given he's dead but you get my point(s).

Trying to successfully rehabilitate evil scum is like trying to rehabilitate a snake not to eat rodents.
 
Huntley is another obvious case of 100% guilty.

Sutcliffe was another.

When you have tens of witnesses, CCTV, Mobile Phone evidence, then evidence is pretty much conclusive whom the guilty party is.

I agree with @Liberation, when the evidence is 100% cast iron, then a length of rope should be re-introduced.

People say "rehabilitate them".

Ok, they served their time, have been "rehabilitated inside", would you be comfy living next door to the above 2 I mentioned? Offering them a job? Having them date a family member or friend?

Yes, I know both got "life terms" and Huntley is unlikely to be ever released but there are others similar who will one day be released - and likely to re-offend.

Obviously a bit tricky with Sutcliffe given he's dead but you get my point(s).

Trying to successfully rehabilitate evil scum is like trying to rehabilitate a snake not to eat rodents.
You dont rehabilitate mass murderers, they go to prison for life, with it meaning life.
 
You dont rehabilitate mass murderers, they go to prison for life, with it meaning life.
At what cost to the taxpayer in times when money is tight?

I'll tell you the exact cost. Still think the below is "value for money"? When cuts are being made everywhere?

In 2022/23, the average cost of a prison place in England and Wales was 51,724 British pounds a year, compared with 46,696 British pounds in the previous reporting year. Since 2015/16, the annual cost of one prison place in England and Wales has increased by around 16,542 British pounds.

 
At what cost to the taxpayer in times when money is tight?

I'll tell you the exact cost. Still think the below is "value for money"? When cuts are being made everywhere?



Ive said before as a democratic society we have to accept that it costs, even the justice and penal system.
 
Ive said before as a democratic society we have to accept that it costs, even the justice and penal system.
Agree to disagree on this issue then.

Saves us both going around the block numerous times repeating and repeating boring everyone.
 
At what cost to the taxpayer in times when money is tight?

I'll tell you the exact cost. Still think the below is "value for money"? When cuts are being made everywhere?



There were a number of studies in the US (including federal and state governments) showing that the death sentence actually costs much more than imprisonment - one of the reasons why even republicans in the US are turning against it. That is just the court costs etc. - if you are going to have the death penalty, then the investments you need to make in testing labs and other top-class facilities are a lot of money.

The moral argument is one thing - but the financial argument does not stack up.
 
Huntley is another obvious case of 100% guilty.

Sutcliffe was another.

When you have tens of witnesses, CCTV, Mobile Phone evidence, then evidence is pretty much conclusive whom the guilty party is.

I agree with @Liberation, when the evidence is 100% cast iron, then a length of rope should be re-introduced.

People say "rehabilitate them".

Ok, they served their time, have been "rehabilitated inside", would you be comfy living next door to the above 2 I mentioned? Offering them a job? Having them date a family member or friend?

Yes, I know both got "life terms" and Huntley is unlikely to be ever released but there are others similar who will one day be released - and likely to re-offend.

Obviously a bit tricky with Sutcliffe given he's dead but you get my point(s).

Trying to successfully rehabilitate evil scum is like trying to rehabilitate a snake not to eat rodents.

I think the line that @Sepp Blatter refers to and is worried about is simple ..ie my answer is when it's "irrefutable"...... Why on earth would/should we rehabilitate evil? Why on earth should we finance their ongoing existence when they snuffed out others on a whim?
 
I can't verify the facts and you have to ignore the drama for TV but where do we stand on this? Revenge or Justice?:

 
I can't verify the facts and you have to ignore the drama for TV but where do we stand on this? Revenge or Justice?:


Justice…

I don’t feel sorry for any of those “ victims “ , got what they deserved and it didn’t cost any money to keep them locked up for 30+ years
 
I can't verify the facts and you have to ignore the drama for TV but where do we stand on this? Revenge or Justice?:


My thoughts on capital punishment are pretty clear but I cant condemn a single act that has happened in this video.

In fact ive often said that the only ones who deserve revenge are the family of those murdered. The woman in the first story had to go inside, no doubt but.............

Criminal she certainly isnt.
 
My thoughts on capital punishment are pretty clear but I cant condemn a single act that has happened in this video.

In fact ive often said that the only ones who deserve revenge are the family of those murdered. The woman in the first story had to go inside, no doubt but.............

Criminal she certainly isnt.

Which is an oxymoron. Difficult isn't it but we'll have to remain separated on this one....I don't honestly believe there is a difference between justice and revenge if it's warranted and certainly not worth quibbling over.
 
Back
Top