Yours is a strange case, Henrys, I have to admit, but it serves as a cautionary tale for the younger members of this forum as to the intelligence of man:
A man walks into a zoo and sees a sign over an enclosure that reads "warning: lion's den". He has the choice to carefully approach the lion should he wish, or to simply move on to other sights and go about his business just like other normal visitors.
Instead of doing any of the above, he bizarrely chooses to enter the lion's den and tries to fight the lion. He is terrified by what he sees and then decides he wants the lion gone.
After initially fleeing in tears, he repeatedly returns to the lion's den hoping to scare the lion away. When this doesn't work, he goes storming off to management ranting about wanting his money back. "Get rid of the lion or else I'm never coming back and you won't see a penny of my money again".
Management are absolutely befuddled and peeing themselves with laughter after closing time.
"Sir, you are choosing to enter the enclosure of your own accord. There is absolutely no case for a refund and no reason to remove the lion".
"Shoot the lion, or else", is the man's retort.
Who's the crazy one in this situation? The man who has an issue with the lion, or the lion itself just for existing and staying within its enclosure?
I think most of this forum knows the answer to that. More importantly, the management of this forum knows the answer to that and I respect that. They are the best in the business and won't be swayed by a couple of crocodile tear types.
People have the choice to stay away from this thread if they dislike it that much. It is that simple.