Appeal for Barkys Red Card - Dismissed/Ban reduced. (Confirmed)

[LancasterRed]

We will just have to play this game this Sunday without Barkhuizen. Will Johnson be back? If so:

Rudd,
Rafferty, Bauer, Davies, Hughes
Pearson, Ledson
Browne, Johnson, Sinclair
Stockley

If no Johnson then Harrop.

Browne on the right? Square pegs in square holes would be better.

 

[northender2]

if that had been someone Rooney against stoke, it would have been rescinded not reduced!

 

[SF]

Potts will replace Barkhuizen, pretty much guaranteed.

I think he's most effective wide right anyway.

 

[OB1]

We will just have to play this game this Sunday without Barkhuizen. Will Johnson be back? If so:

Rudd,
Rafferty, Bauer, Davies, Hughes
Pearson, Ledson
Browne, Johnson, Sinclair
Stockley

If no Johnson then Harrop.

Why would you push Browne out right when you have Maguire Harrop and Potts who can fill it comfortably

Never mind the fact you’ve suggested stockley after the mess of a performance against Saturday

 

[norky84]

So they've basically created an orange card and deemed a 1 game ban as the punishment for such an 'offence.' Pathetic decision.

 

[paddysr]

So they've basically created an orange card and deemed a 1 game ban as the punishment for such an 'offence.' Pathetic decision.

Nope still a red but the equivalent of 2 yellows for the ban....which makes me think it should have been a yellow but what do I know

 

[SuffolknWhat]

Another shite decision
They all back each other and piss in the same pot

 

[B(rad)P(otts)IG]

Has that ever happened before? Not something I remember seeing.

 

[norky84]

Nope still a red but the equivalent of 2 yellows for the ban....which makes me think it should have been a yellow but what do I know

Well 2 yellow card offences is a 1 game ban. But this was 1 offence, and a 1 game ban. Whereas a red card for violent conduct is a 3 game ban. So they've effectively said it's in between a yellow and red card i.e. effectively orange.

 

[Spavin Stardust]

Baffling

 

[Yoowell]

Quite unbelievable....have these people ever played the game.

 

[Bhagwan Hardcastle]

Well 2 yellow card offences is a 1 game ban. But this was 1 offence, and a 1 game ban. Whereas a red card for violent conduct is a 3 game ban. So they've effectively said it's in between a yellow and red card i.e. effectively orange.

Funny I've never seen an orange card come out of refs pocket yet. Perhaps it's something they can trial at the next world cup!!!!

 

[pnewortham]

Funny I've never seen an orange card come out of refs pocket yet. Perhaps it's something they can trial at the next world cup!!!!

There's a blue card in kids football...

 

[Elwiss]

Useless what a farce it all is - protect the incorrect decision - cop out

 

[Walton]

Has this scenario happened before?

 

[Thracia]

It's pretty standard to appeal for "wrongful dismissal" (shouldn't have been a red in the first place) and also "excessive punishment" (the length of the suspension is too long).

If you fail the "wrongful dismissal" part (as we did), you can still win the second part of the appeal, but the minimum ban is 1 game, as it's still a red card.

You can't have the red card upheld but a zero match ban.

 

[Henry Weston]

The FA heard the appeal, not EFL.

Appropriate, as they make absolutely FA sense.

 

[pnewortham]

Which part of this was a red card?

(Edit - more specific question - both players sliding forwards, not under control, with their legs out in front, how is Barky a red card and Fox nothing?)

 

[buckshawwhite]

Absolutely spineless by the FA... Yet again wanting to be seen to protect a completely inept referee who should serve a Championship season ban !!!

 

[miff]

Which part of this was a red card?

(Edit - more specific question - both players sliding forwards, not under control, with their legs out in front, how is Barky a red card and Fox nothing?)

View attachment 1708

Because Barky didn't roll round screaming like a mard ass.