Scannyuk
Starting 11
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2023
- Messages
- 41
I’d say that’s spot on in defining what we are and probably a great example of the system and styles limitations.Our goalkeeper plays more long balls than 22 other goalkeepers in the division. If you have any evidence to refute that - please let me know.
I didn't say we were like the Wimbledon of old. I said we are by definition a long ball team due to all the passing stats available - short, medium and long.
How many times a game does Woodman boot it 50 yards to the touchline for a Potts or Brady type to try to win a header? More than most teams I'd wager.
As a team we don't seek to dictate possession through slow build up from the back. No statistics would support an opinion that suggests otherwise.
Our centrebacks don't have the necessary ability on the ball. So our penchant for long balls is partly a needs must scenario.
Woodman for being a great shot stopper has appalling distribution. Long ball passes from Freddie has us a clear second with 971, Rotherham are streets ahead on 1397 with Birmingham a distant third on 822.
He launches it 61% of the time.. why?, because we lack the ball playing ability to play out, and he’s not good at spotting the open man to start the quick counter while the defence is not set.
Just look at how often we retain possession from a throw in.. we don’t have the movement to cut teams open (aside from Coventry) with intricate passes.
I guess it’s the market we shop in these days. Our back three are decent defenders but aren’t ball players and teams easily stop us by letting Liam and Jordan have the ball and sit back, cutting off the pass to the right and left wing backs. We then just pass aimlessly sideways waiting for the long ball to come.